PART 1503--COMMENTING
Authority: NEPA, the Environmental Quality Improvement Act of 1970, as
amended (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.), sec. 309 of the Clean Air Act, as
amended
(42 U.S.C. 7609), and E.O. 11514 (Mar. 5, 1970, as amended by E.O. 11991,
May
24, 1977).
Source: 43 FR 55997, Nov. 29, 1978, unless otherwise noted.
Sec. 1503.1 Inviting comments.
Sec. 1503.2 Duty to comment.
Federal agencies with jurisdiction by law or special expertise with
respect
to any environmental impact involved and agencies which are authorized to
develop and enforce environmental standards shall comment on statements
within their jurisdiction, expertise, or authority. Agencies shall comment
within the time period specified for comment in Sec. 1506.10. A Federal
agency may reply that it has no comment. If a cooperating agency is
satisfied
that its views are adequately reflected in the environmental impact
statement, it should reply that it has no comment.
Sec. 1503.3 Specificity of comments.
(a) Comments on an environmental impact statement or on a proposed
action
shall be as specific as possible and may address either the adequacy of
the
statement or the merits of the alternatives discussed or both.
(b) When a commenting agency criticizes a lead agency's predictive
methodology, the commenting agency should describe the alternative
methodology which it prefers and why.
(c) A cooperating agency shall specify in its comments whether it needs
additional information to fulfill other applicable environmental reviews
or
consultation requirements and what information it needs. In particular, it
shall specify any additional information it needs to comment adequately on
the draft statement's analysis of significant site-specific effects
associated with the granting or approving by that cooperating agency of
necessary Federal permits, licenses, or entitlements.
(d) When a cooperating agency with jurisdiction by law objects to or
expresses reservations about the proposal on grounds of environmental
impacts, the agency expressing the objection or reservation shall specify
the
mitigation measures it considers necessary to allow the agency to grant or
approve applicable permit, license, or related requirements or
concurrences.
Sec. 1503.4 Response to comments.
(a) An agency preparing a final environmental impact statement shall
assess
and consider comments both individually and collectively, and shall
respond
by one or more of the means listed below, stating its response in the
final
statement. Possible responses are to:
- Modify alternatives including the proposed action.
- Develop and evaluate alternatives not previously given serious
consideration by the agency.
- Supplement, improve, or modify its analyses.
- Make factual corrections.
- Explain why the comments do not warrant further agency response,
citing
the sources, authorities, or reasons which support the agency's position
and,
if appropriate, indicate those circumstances which would trigger agency
reappraisal or further response.
(b) All substantive comments received on the draft statement (or
summaries
thereof where the response has been exceptionally voluminous), should be
attached to the final statement whether or not the comment is thought to
merit individual discussion by the agency in the text of the statement.
(c) If changes in response to comments are minor and are confined to the
responses described in paragraphs (a)(4) and (5) of this section, agencies
may write them on errata sheets and attach them to the statement instead
of
rewriting the draft statement. In such cases only the comments, the
responses, and the changes and not the final statement need be circulated
(Sec. 1502.19). The entire document with a new cover sheet shall be filed
as
the final statement (Sec. 1506.9).
Back to Table of Contents
|